Calling all high school aged soft robotics enthusiasts! We want YOU to do something cool with soft robotics! Work with your team to design a novel device which incorporates some of the soft robotic components documented on the Soft Robotics Toolkit website. Example projects might include:
- Wearable robotic systems to assist or augment human performance
- Robots capable of manipulating delicate objects
- Robots capable of novel forms of locomotion
- Improved control systems for soft robotics
- Improving an existing device by incorporating soft components
Your design may be entirely “soft,” or may combine traditional rigid robotic elements with soft components. The only limitations (besides your imagination) are that:
- The design must make use of at least one component technology from the Soft Robotics Toolkit website
- The design must be novel. You may not submit a project that was completed prior to the beginning of the competition.*
(*If you have previously completed a research project related to soft robotics, please see the Prize for Contributions in Soft Robotics.)
Register for the competition here. You will receive a confirmation email upon completion. Check your spam folder if you don't see it in your inbox! After you have registered, we will contact you with information on how to set up your wiki page on our website.
The best projects will be featured on the soft robotics toolkit website. In addition, there will be a grand prize awarded to the best team, as well as a few smaller prizes for runners up.
You must document your team's project using a provided "wiki". Competition entries will be judged based on the wiki pages only! Your team's wiki will remain private while the competition is in progress, but will be shared publicly after results have been announced. At a minimum, your team's wiki must include the following sections:
- A Background section describing the problem you are trying to solve, as well as a brief introduction of your team;
- A Design section describing your solution, its strengths and weaknesses, as well as the rationale for your design decisions;
- A Fabrication section documenting how you built your final prototype; and
- A Testing section demonstrating the performance of your final prototype. This section should include high quality images and a 30-second infomercial-style video of your final prototype.
Images and videos of you building your project and your project in action are strongly recommended! At a minimum each page should include 2 photos/videos showing the various stages of your project’s development.
- Registration is now open! Teams will be assigned project wikis after they are registered.
- February 2017: Project title and description due.
- June 12, 2017: Team wikis are frozen. Teams will not be allowed to edit their wiki after this date.
- July 2017: Winners are announced.
Scoring Rubric (50 points total)
- Project Idea (20 points)
- The need: has the team made a strong case that there is a need for their idea? Have they outlined the potential impact of their idea? (5 points)
- Functional requirements: are the goals of the project clearly defined? Are the criteria for success provided? (5 points)
- Quality: is the proposed solution interesting and novel? (10 points)
- Project Implementation (10 points)
- Prototype: did the team build a working prototype? Does the prototype meet the functional requirements set by the team? (10 points)
- Project Documentation (20 points)
- Overall quality: Is the documentation well-written and easy to understand? Are there sufficient photos/videos that support the documentation? (5 points)
- Design: Does this section include an overview of the design as well as a discussion of its strengths, weaknesses, and potential modifications? (5 points) Example of a high scoring design section.
- Fabrication: Does this section describe the procedure used to build the prototype? Does it include useful visual aids? (5 points) Example of a high scoring fabrication section.
- Testing: Does the wiki include a demonstration of the working prototype? Does the wiki describe tests that were done to evaluate the design, and are the results of testing provided? (5 points) Example of a high scoring testing section.
(In the case of a tiebreak, the team with the highest "Project Documentation" score will win.)
An international panel of expert judges will score each project using the rubric below. Details of the judging panel will be released over the coming months.