The testing phase was comprised of five tests, each measuring the amount of heat transfer in both the Soft Barrier's active and dormant states. Temperature data loggers organized the final data into ten second intervals. The data was then projected onto a graph.
These initial tests were flawed and must be conducted again. The temperature difference between the two test chambers was minuscule. Temperatures within the inflated Soft Barrier test chamber rose higher when compared to those of the deflated test chamber, but both temperatures dropped at an almost similar pace.
These defective first tests may be the result of faulty and volatile heat lamps. More tests need to be performed with equal environments and better heating equipment. Heating pads may be used for future tests.
Although the initial tests did not work, it was pleasant to see that the integrated thermochromic pigments responded well to the temperature differences.
Project Weaknesses:
- Long term test were not conducted, but must be done to understand how the Soft Barrier will react in exterior conditions such as wind, rain and intense sunlight.
- The embedded thermochromic pigment was introduced to the design with a full knowledge of its weakness and strength. Its weakness is the inability to withstand long term exposure to UV light, but research and improvement on the product is currently being conducted.
- Other weaknesses the Soft Barrier may have include the design and materials being used. The possibility of testing the same design in other materials or forms of rubber silicone may help protect the Soft Barrier from exposure to long term damages, especially popping.
- A further design of the Soft Barrier robot will also have to address weak spots found in the design section. The next prototype will require a greater overlap of the air pockets.