Researchers are invited to submit original work to the Soft Robotics Toolkit website as part of the 2018 Soft Robotics Research Challenge. This category is intended to support and promote research that advances the field of soft robotics through submissions from our international community of researchers and professionals. Eligible entries might include contributions in:
- New soft robotics component technologies (actuators, sensors, pumps, valves, control hardware, etc.)
- New modeling and analysis approaches for compliant electromechanical systems
- New control architectures (hardware and/or software) for soft robotics systems
- New experimental procedures for characterizing soft systems
- The work must have been published or accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal or conference proceedings.
- Research conducted by either individuals or teams is eligible.
To be considered for the prize, simply document your work on the Soft Robotics Toolkit website by June 2018. All website contributions that meet the eligibility criteria will automatically be considered for the prize.
Registration for the competition is now open! Upon completion of the registration form you will receive a confirmation email detailing the submission process using our site's wiki page. Check your spam folder if you don't see it in your inbox!
The best projects will be featured as published additions to the Soft Robotics Toolkit website. In addition, there will be a grand prize awarded to the author(s) of the best contribution, as well as a few smaller prizes for runners up.
It is expected that, if participants have an interest in potential intellectual property arising from their work, they will handle this with their home institution prior to submission. You will retain all intellectual property and credit for the work.
By the deadline, you must provide detailed documentation describing your research project. At a minimum, your documentation set should include:
- A Design section providing an overview of the technology, the reason that it is an important contribution, and its strengths and weaknesses;
- An Implementation section documenting in detail how you implemented the technology and containing files that another researcher would require to replicate your work (e.g. source code, FEM input files, CAD files, bills of materials);
- A Testing section describing the experimental procedure followed and the results obtained. This section should also include high quality images and a 30-second infomercial-style video of the technology.
The focus here is on replicability: the documentation should be more detailed than a typical research paper. In particular, the Implementation section should provide enough detail to enable a student to replicate the work with no additional assistance. Visual representations of your work such as embedded media should also supplement your documentation. Photos and/or videos are strongly suggested at a minimum of 2 photos per page. Examples of complete documentation sets can be found here and here.
To be considered for the prize, entrants should expect to dedicate significant effort (i.e. beyond that of a standard academic paper) to provide high quality documentation (e.g. multimedia tutorials or protocols) and all related files along with clear instructions so someone can easily adapt to their own needs. Contributions based on exciting research alone will likely not be competitive. Our goal is to build an intellectual toolkit to enable replication of work between research groups and institutions.
- January 2018: Registration is now OPEN! Teams will be assigned project wikis after they are registered.
- April 10, 2018: Project title and description due.
- June 12, 2018: Team wikis are frozen. Teams will not be allowed to edit their wiki after this date.
After the close of the competition and wikis are frozen, our judges will begin deliberating winners for each category of the competition. Once judging concludes winners are announced through the site.
The following guidelines should be used to guide the design and documentation process for each entry. Judges final deliberations for the winner will take into consideration the novelty of the project's idea, implementation of a prototype and the quality of documentation for each submission.
- Contribution: does the entry represent a significant contribution to the field of soft robotics?
- Specifications: are the goals of the project clearly defined? Are the criteria for success provided?
- Quality: is the proposed solution interesting and novel?
- Implementation: did the entry accomplish the stated goals?
- Replicability: is the documentation well-written and easy to understand? Is there sufficient documentation of photos/videos to support each page of the process? Would it be possible for one of your students to replicate the work with no additional support from the original researchers?
- Design: does this section include an overview of the contribution as well as a discussion of its strengths, weaknesses, and potential modifications? Example of a high scoring design section.
- Implementation: does this section describe the procedure used to implement the technology? Does it include useful visual aids? Example of a high scoring implementation section.
- Testing: Does the documentation include a demonstration of the technology? Does it describe tests that were done to characterize the technology, and are the results of testing provided? Example of a high scoring testing section.
An international panel of soft robotics experts will score all entries based on the rubric below. Judges will be assigned such that no judge is evaluating work conducted at his or her own institution. Details of the judging panel will be announced in the coming months.